Blog

Bovine Colostrum and Superbugs

Antibiotic-resistant superbugs are lurking in our food supply

by Douglas A. Wyatt, Director of Research, Center for Nutritional Research

Superbugs were once a figment of Hollywood’s imagination, but no more. These antibiotic-resistant bacteria and deadly viruses are definitely real; they’re here and making people ill in record numbers and taking lives. Superbugs commonly found in the soil and in animal and human gastrointestinal tracts make their way to the dinner table via contaminated processing equipment, food workers’ dirty hands, manure applied to crops, as well as livestock and fish, who have themselves been raised on unnecessary antibiotics.

An article in the December 2013 issue of Consumer Reports reported that 97% of more than three hundred raw chicken breast samples contained illness-causing bacteria. The chicken breasts were purchased across the U.S. and included organic brands and those labeled “raised without antibiotics”. The most common bacteria detected was Enterococcus, which occurred in 79.8% percent of the samples, followed by E. coli (65.2%); campylobacter (43%); klebsiella pneumonia (13.6%); salmonella (10.8%); and staphylococcus aureus (9.2 %). Virtually every sample contained some type of bacteria, including the “organic” and “no antibiotics” breasts.

Even more disturbing were the findings that nearly half (49.7%) of the samples contained at least one type of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and another 11.5% contained two or more types of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Although consumers are advised to cook chicken to an internal temperature of 165° F and to follow safe handling practices, unintentional cross contamination and subsequent ingestion is exceedingly common. Chicken is the most popular meat consumed in the U.S., and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), says that “more deaths are attributed to poultry than to any other commodity.”

Chicken may cause the most deaths, but it’s certainly not the only source of food poisoning. According to the CDC, forty-eight million Americans become ill from eating tainted food every year. That’s roughly one of every six people. 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 die from a foodborne illness. But food poisoning is only part of the equation. The problem is compounded by livestock operations that regularly feed antibiotics to cattle, pigs, and fish even in the absence of illness. This creates strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which when humans encounter, are impervious to our drugs. According to the CDC’s report, Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013, two million people become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria annually, and at least 23,000 deaths are attributable to these infections. An indeterminate number of people die from other conditions that were exacerbated by the antibiotic-resistant infection.

The CDC report also confirmed the widely-held belief that there is a link between the routine use/misuse/overuse of antibiotics in livestock which has led to the escalating incidence of superbugs. Approximately 80% of all antibiotics utilized in the U.S. are administered to farm animals, and the misuse pertains to farmers who knowingly inject them into healthy livestock on a regular basis. The CDC report noted a few specific pathogens whose spread to humans is driven by farm practices. These include campylobacter which causes 310,000 infections per year with 28 reported deaths, and drug-resistant salmonella, which infects 100,000 people each year and resulted in 38 deaths. Even more staggering are the statistics for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) which accounts for 80,461 severe cases per year and kills 11,285 people annually. The CDC does not directly link MRSA to livestock production, but it does note that the number of MRSA cases acquired during hospital stays has decreased dramatically in recent years, while the overall rates of MRSA infections have increased rapidly in the general population despite not having received care in any healthcare setting.

So why would so many otherwise healthy people come down with MRSA? A recent JAMA Internal Medicine study said that increasing evidence points to factory-scale hog facilities as a source of MRSA. People living near hog farms or in areas where hog manure is applied to crops as fertilizer have an increased risk of contracting MRSA. People with the highest exposure to manure, based on how close they lived to farms, farm acreage, and quantity of manure used, were 38% more likely to get MRSA than the lowest exposure level.

Superbugs often wreak havoc on the gastrointestinal tract by causing severe vomiting and diarrhea, which may lead to life-threatening dehydration. Diarrhea is especially lethal to infants and worldwide, it is the second leading cause of death in infants. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains are more virulent and result in more hospitalizations than non-resistant strains. Antibiotics can be especially dangerous to infants, hospital patients, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems. Since antibiotics cannot distinguish between good and bad bacteria, they kill everything. When the good bacteria in the gut is eradicated, it can no longer protect against the dangerous bacteria, which leaves patients susceptible to potentially fatal infections such as MRSA or Clostridium difficle (C. diff.). Additionally, antibiotics are ineffective against virus-caused diarrhea, so at-risk populations have an elevated mortality rate.

So, not only is the deliberate use of antibiotics in livestock killing people, but so is the fertilizer from these animals. Contaminated water that runs off from large scale livestock operations can affect nearby farms, even those that are certified “organic”. Farmers routinely apply fertilizers derived from antibiotic-fed fish and manure from antibiotic-fed livestock to crops as a means to encourage growth and increase crop yield. The majority of recent foodborne illness outbreaks have been linked to raw fruits and vegetables, specifically spinach, lettuce, cantaloupe, and avocados. Even organic farmers use animal-based fertilizers that may contain livestock-grade antibiotics and hormones which are readily absorbed by plants. This reinforces the truth that no one is immune from unintentional antibiotic consumption – not even vegans.

 

The Role of Bovine Colostrum in Fighting Superbugs

Bovine colostrum is our last and most promising hope for survival against superbugs. Studies show that bovine antibodies can be effective in the prevention or treatment of human and animal diseases caused by enteropathogenic microbes (bacteria, viruses, protozoans, and fungi). Bovine colostrum passes immunity to all the disease-causing pathogens that the cow has encountered in her lifetime, including the antibodies she received from her mother. While the female cow is expressing colostrum, she is essentially a broad-spectrum, all-natural pharmacy.

The Center for Nutritional Research recommends bovine colostrum supplements to help neutralize bacterial pathogens found in the food supply and to prevent potentially deadly illnesses caused by antibiotic-resistant superbugs. Supplementing with bovine colostrum is an added defense against bacterial pathogens in the nation’s food supply. Bovine colostrum contains natural antibodies against all six bacterial strains detected by the Consumer Reports investigative team -- Enterococcus, E. coli, campylobacter, klebsiella pneumonia, salmonella, and staphylococcus aureus -- among many others. These superbugs may be antibiotic resistant, but they’re no match against antibodies. Taking colostrum on a daily basis, in addition to proper food handling habits, can help prevent these nasty, deadly pathogens from infecting humans.

The efficacy of any bovine colostrum supplement is determined by the antimicrobial activity of the specific antibodies, which must be preserved during the manufacturing process. There is only one colostrum supplement on the market that undergoes a rigorous testing protocol to certify that it is from the first milking and is free of antibiotics and pesticides. This colostrum product has been tested and confirmed to contain active antibodies against the following disease-causing microbes:

 

 Bacteria:    
Bacillus cereus        
Listeria monocytogenes   
Salmonella enteritidis
Streptococcus pyogenes Yersinia enterocolitica Salmonella typhimurium
Streptococcus agalactiae Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumonia
Streptococcus pneumoniae Escherichia coli O157:H7 Propionibacterium acnes
Streptococcus mutans Haemophilus influenza Vibrio cholera
Staphylococcus epidermidis Campylobacter jejuni  
Staphylococcus aureus Helicobacter pylori  
     
Viruses:  
   
Adenovirus
Hepatitis C virus
Polio virus
Alphavirus Herpes viruses Respiratory syncytial virus
Dengue virus HIV-1 Rotavirus
Echovirus Human Papilloma virus St. Louis virus
Epstein-Barr virus Influenza West Nile virus
Enterovirus 71 Japanese encephalithis Yellow fever virus
Hantavirus Measles  
     
Fungus:    
Candida albicans    
     

 Liposomal Delivery Advantage & Standardization

To achieve the gastrointestinal benefits of bovine colostrum, it is crucial that the active components will bypass digestion in the stomach and be bioavailable for uptake and distribution to the body’s cells. Additionally, colostrum must be soluble for free dispersion throughout the GI tract. Liposomal Delivery Advantage enhances the bioavailability, and extensive research shows that such an enhanced delivery method allows ingested bovine colostrum to achieve the intended results. ONLY select colostrum supplements that are GMP certified, contain a standardized content of active components, are flash pasteurized without loss of effectiveness, are derived from first-milking pastured cows, and utilize Liposomal Delivery Advantage.

 

Safety of Bovine Colostrum Supplements

No significant health risks have been reported during or after oral ingestion of colostral preparations. Colostrum supplementation is generally regarded as a non-invasive intervention, and therefore, safe.

 

It is important that diagnosis and evaluation of chronic symptoms be determined by qualified health care professionals either natural health care practitioner or complimentary care physician. The above is not intended to diagnose or treat disease and the statements herein have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 The Center for Nutritional Research is a not for-profit organization located in Sedona, Arizona dedicated to the continued research and promotion of bovine colostrum. The Center for Nutritional Research has pioneered colostrum collection and processing technology for human consumption. This information is copyrighted and may not be reproduced without express permission from the Center for Nutritional Research.

 

 

To learn more about this revolutionary product,

Click HERE.


This is a Sponsored Link.

 

REFERENCES

The high cost of cheap chicken. Consumer Reports. December 2013. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2014/02/the-high-cost-of-cheap-chicken/index.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013.

Steele J, et al. Hyperimmune bovine colostrum for treatment of GI infections: A review and update on Clostridium difficile. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013;22;9(7).

Casey JA, et al. High-Density Livestock Operations, Crop Field Application of Manure, and Risk of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Pennsylvania. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2013;173(21):1980-90.

Otto W, et al. Randomized control trials using a tablet formulation of hyperimmune bovine colostrum to prevent diarrhea caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in volunteers. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011;46(7-8):862-8.

Antibiotic Resistance. Statement of Ali Khan, MD, MPH, Assistant Surgeon General and Acting Deputy Director, National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, July 14, 2010.

Belcaro G, et al. Prevention of flu episodes with colostrum and Bifivir compared with vaccination: an epidemiological, registry study. Panminerva Med. 2010;52(4):269-75.

Rawal P, et al. Role of colostrum in gastrointestinal infections. Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2008;75(9):917-21.

Huang XH, et al. Specific IgG activity of bovine immune milk against diarrhea bacteria and its protective effects on pathogen-infected intestinal damages. Vaccine. 2008;26(47):5973-80.

Vilte DA, et al. Bovine colostrum contains immunoglobulin G antibodies against intimin, EspA, and EspB and inhibits hemolytic activity mediated by the type three secretion system of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2008;15(8):1208-13.

Rokka S, et al. Effect of specific colostral antibodies and selected lactobacilli on the adhesion of Helicobacter pylori on AGS cells and the Helicobacter-induced IL-8 production. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology. 2008;68(3):280-6.

Kuribayashi T, et al. Neutralizing activity of bovine colostral antibody against verotoxin derived from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in mice. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2006;12(5):251-6.

Xu LB, et al. Bovine immune colostrum against 17 strains of diarrhea bacteria and in vitro and in vivo effects of its specific IgG. Vaccine. 2006;24(12):2131-40.

Akisu C, et al. Effect of human milk and colostrum on Entamoeba histolyica. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2004;10(5):741-742.

Solomons NW. Modulation of the immune system and the response against pathogens with bovine colostrum concentrates. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2002;56(Suppl.3):524-528.

Funatogawa K, et al. Use of immunoglobulin enriched bovine colostrum against oral challenge with enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in mice. Microbiol Immunol. 2002;46(11):761-6.

van der Strate BW, et al. Antiviral activities of lactoferrin. Antiviral Research 2001;52(3):225-39.

Lilius EM, Marnila P. The role of colostral antibodies in prevention of microbial infections. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 2001;14(3): 295-300.

Korhonen H, et al. Bovine milk antibodies for health. British Journal of Nutrition 2000;84(Suppl. 1):S135-S146.

van Hooijdonk AC, Kussendrager KD, Steijns JM. In vivo antimicrobial and antiviral activity of components in bovine milk and colostrum involved in non-specific defence. Br J Nutr. 2000;84 Suppl 1:S127-34.

Huppertz HI, et al. Bovine colostrum ameliorates diarrhea in infection with diarrheagenic Escherichia coli, shiga toxin-producing E. Coli, and E. coli expressing intimin and hemolysin. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;29(4):452-6.

Wada T, et al. The therapeutic effect of bovine lactoferrin in the host infected with Helicobacter pylori. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1999;34(3):238-243.

Sarker SA, et al. Successful treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in children with immunoglobulin from immunized bovine colostrum. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(12):1149-54.

Ylitalo S, et al. Rotaviral antibodies in the treatment of acute rotaviral gastroenteritis. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87(3):264-267.

Mitra AK, et al. Hyperimmune cow colostrum reduces diarrhoea due to rotavirus: a double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84(9):996-1001.

Korhonen H. Bactericidal effect of bovine normal and immune serum, colostrum and milk against Helicobacter pylori. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1995;78:655-662.

Shield J, et al. Bovine colostrum immunoglobulin concentrate for cryptosporidiosis in AIDS. Arch Dis Child.1993;69:451-453.

Ebina T, et al. Passive immunizations of suckling mice and infants with bovine colostrum containing antibodies to human rotavirus. Journal of Medical Virology 1992;38(2):117-123.

Tacket CO, et al. Efficacy of bovine milk immunoglobulin concentrate in preventing illness after Shigella flexneri challenge. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;47(3):276-83.

Ellison RT III, Giehl TJ. Killing of gram-negative bacteria by lactoferrin and lysozyme. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1991;88(4):1080-1091.

Shortridge KF, Lawton JW, Choi EK. Protective potential of colostrum and early milk against prospective influenza viruses. J Trop Pediatr. 1990;36(2):945.

Stephan W, Dichtelmuller H, Lissner R. Antibodies from colostrum in oral immunotherapy. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1990;28(1):19-23.

Davidson GP, et al. Passive immunisation of children with bovine colostrum containing antibodies to human rotavirus. Lancet 1989;2(8665):709-12.

Hilpert H, et al. Use of bovine milk concentrate containing antibody to rotavirus to treat rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants. J Infect Dis. 1987;156(1):158-66.

Brüssow H, et al. Bovine milk immunoglobulins for passive immunity to infantile rotavirus gastroenteritis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1987;25(6):982-986.

Tzipori S, Roberton D, Chapman C. Remission of diarrhoea due to cryptosporidiosis in an immunodeficient child treated with hyperimmune bovine colostrum. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;293(6557):1276-7.

Ho PC, Lawton JW. Human colostral cells: phagocytosis and killing of E. coli and C. albicans. Journal of Pediatrics 1978;93(6):910–915.

Sabin AB, Fieldsteel AH. Antipoliomyelitic activity of human and bovine colostrum and milk. Pediatrics 1962;29:105-115.

Campbell B, Petersen WE. Antibodies in milk for protection against human disease. Milchwissenschaft 1959;14:469-473.

 

What is Colostrum Good For?

ICNR.org

Multimedia

microphone
Check our multimedia files here

Our Newsletter

email this page